This is one of the more serious attempts I’ve seen to move regulation out of static cycles and into continuous coordination.
Treating law as a live system with simulation, feedback, and human decision points preserved, feels like a necessary adaptation to the Intelligent Age.
The interesting question isn’t whether this replaces sovereignty, but how long traditional rulemaking can function without something like this layered on top.
Most AI in government talk is about automating paperwork. This is about simulating how laws actually play out before they're passed. Whether it works as advertised is another question, but the framing is more ambitious than most.
Brillaint piece on this regulatory model. The Unified Regulatory Digital Twin idea is fascianting because it creates a feedback loop between policy outcomes and legislative updates in real-time. I've seen similar twin frameworks in manufacturing, and the 70% acceleration claim makes sense when you eliminate the lag betewen impact measurement and policy response. Worth noting though that the "Soveregin Governance-in-the-Loop" part will be the real test since human bottlenecks might offset algorithmic speed gains.
This is one of the more serious attempts I’ve seen to move regulation out of static cycles and into continuous coordination.
Treating law as a live system with simulation, feedback, and human decision points preserved, feels like a necessary adaptation to the Intelligent Age.
The interesting question isn’t whether this replaces sovereignty, but how long traditional rulemaking can function without something like this layered on top.
Most AI in government talk is about automating paperwork. This is about simulating how laws actually play out before they're passed. Whether it works as advertised is another question, but the framing is more ambitious than most.
Brillaint piece on this regulatory model. The Unified Regulatory Digital Twin idea is fascianting because it creates a feedback loop between policy outcomes and legislative updates in real-time. I've seen similar twin frameworks in manufacturing, and the 70% acceleration claim makes sense when you eliminate the lag betewen impact measurement and policy response. Worth noting though that the "Soveregin Governance-in-the-Loop" part will be the real test since human bottlenecks might offset algorithmic speed gains.